Victoria Burge
The Harvard Standard Regions and North Polar Sequence Work
Star Data was inspired by objects found in a collection of contact prints. These objects came from two related projects at the Harvard College Observatory: the Harvard Standard Regions and the North Polar Sequence. Both aimed to provide astronomers with reliable sets of stars for calibrating stellar magnitudes. One of the biggest challenges with photographic plates was correcting for differences in telescopes and photographic materials.
The Standard Regions project sought to identify stars of fixed magnitudes across different parts of the sky. Wide-field plates would then capture several of these constant, non-variable stars, giving researchers a consistent standard for comparison. The Polar Sequence focused on a precise group of non-variable stars near Polaris, the North Star. Plates were made using a double-exposure technique: first the target field, then—after shifting the telescope—the same plate was exposed for the same duration on Polaris. This method required a new approach to plate-making and could not be retroactively applied to earlier plates.
Henrietta Swan Leavitt worked on both projects in the final years of her life. By the time of her death in 1921, she had made significant progress. The following year, Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin arrived from England to pursue her doctorate at Harvard. The new observatory director, Harlow Shapley, initially encouraged her to continue Leavitt’s unfinished work, but she declined—choosing instead to study stellar spectra, supported by funding from Radcliffe College and a British women’s fellowship. Over a decade later, in the mid-1930s, Payne-Gaposchkin returned as a paid researcher, and Shapley once again assigned her the same task.
Contact Prints
Each piece in Star Data is paired with a contact print from this collection—a lesser-discussed but important medium in the history of astronomical photography. To create a contact print, an intermediate positive glass plate was made from the original negative. This plate was then placed on photographic paper in the darkroom and exposed to produce the print.
This process offered several advantages. Multiple copies of the same dataset could be produced, allowing different annotations and measurements on each. For example, one print in the collection shows stellar magnitudes marked across the image, while another labels the corresponding stars.
Darkroom techniques were also used to reveal different details. By deliberately under- or over-exposing a negative, astronomers could emphasize certain features. An over-exposed print might reveal faint, smaller stars more clearly, though at the cost of clarity in the brightest stars.
Different types of photographic paper added further variation. Prints made from the same negative sometimes appear on multiple kinds of paper—likely due to cost considerations or the desired qualities of a particular brand, such as surface gloss. Dates inscribed on the backs of prints show that these variations often occurred simultaneously. Further research is needed to fully understand how these choices affected the data.
Annotation and Work
One of the central themes in Victoria Burge’s work, including Star Data, is the recognition of labor and the often-overlooked artifacts that record it. In the Plate Stacks, both glass plates and photographic prints are heavily annotated—covered in the handwriting of generations of researchers and astronomers. Burge’s artwork draws attention to these marks as evidence of the scientific process.
The detail of the print shown above illustrates why annotation was essential: labeling. Hundreds of stars are individually numbered, while pencil-drawn concentric rings form a bullseye around the north celestial pole. Straight radial lines mark Right Ascension, and curved arcs trace Declination.
This particular print inspired Star Data II. When Burge’s work is placed over the image, its punched holes reveal the hand-drawn numbers beneath, not the photographed objects. The size of each hole corresponds to the size of the annotation, not the star itself—making the pattern one step removed from the sky it represents. By following the rhythm of these perforations, one can also discern the underlying circular rings, even though Burge chose to replicate only the inked annotations.